Briefly address the following:
How does Haraway (“A Cyborg Manifesto”) expand upon the traditional definition of the cyborg? What is the cyborg’s relation to and challenges it poses to the Western tradition, particularly the “myth of original unity” and dualism (mind/body, male/female, culture/nature)? Describe the three “boundary breakdowns” that have given the cyborg myth its political potential. How does “cyborg writing” express the dispersed, non-unified self that emerges within the conditions of advanced industrialized societies (discuss one example from the essay)?
Greg Borkman, section 319
ReplyDeleteHaraway defines a cyborg as a "cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction". She also expands this by saying that a cyborg is a condensed image of both imagination and material reality and the two when joined together create a structure of possibilities to change history. She also says that a cyborg skips the steps of identification with nature and this is what makes them distinguishable as not human. The cyborg's relation to the western tradition is it has no origin story, it is completely independent. Nature and culture are reworked. The boundary breakdowns that have given the cyborg myth its political potential, the boundary between human and animal has been breached, people no longer feel the need for separation between human and animal. Another distinct boundary is between physical and non-physical and how it is imprecise for us. One example of the non-unified self that emerges within the conditions of advanced industrialized societies is the "cyborg writing", meaning it's silicon chip, is the ultimate scorecard for nuclear scores, Haraway raises the question how are we unified if we are still keeping score of the last time we were wrong by our so called friends.
Mark Semke, Film 301
ReplyDeleteIn the article "A Cyborg Manifesto", Donna Haraway explores the boundaries of the cyborg. She defines it as a "cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction". She goes on to say that we are, in a sense, cyborgs, theorized and fabricated hybrids of machine and organism. The cyborg poses a challenge to the myth of original unity by skipping that step, of identification of nature in the western sense. The cyborg has not been created in nature, it is an entity all its own and has "cheated" nature, so to speak. The boundary breakdowns are that the boundaries between human and animal have been compromised. There is also a damaged distinction between human/animal and machine. And Haraway goes on to say that the boundary between the physical and the non-physical has been fractured, impercise. "Cyborg Writing" expresses the non-unified self that emerges by the silicon chip as a surface for writing. One example is comparing the clunky tv sets of the 50s to today's advanced technology of tv wrist bands or hand-sized video cameras. Todays machines are nothing but clean, lightweight, portable electromagnetic waves.
Haraway expands upon the definition of the cyborg through her relation of the cyborg to feminism and society. She compares the cyborg's freedom of experience to the freedom of experiences of the feminist movement. The cyborg challenges the Western tradition because it does not have it's own origin story. While our Western and human tradition goes back to the source of all life, the original phallic mother, the "original unity", the cyborg does not have an origin story. It is both mother and father, it is genderless, and it is a mixture of the organic and the mechanic. The first boundary breakdown is between animals and humans in the sense that both animals and humans share share many of the same levels of consciousness; emotions, for example. The second boundary breakdown is between organic organisms and machines basically through the aspect of active information processing. The third boundary breakdown is between the physical and the nonphysical in the idea that information or experience can be built upon bases of electricity and magnetics; the internet is a prime example. Haraway talks about Audre Lorde's "Sister Outsider" saying how the Sister, upon entering the industrialized society, becomes merely a small part of the giant machine of the society. She is specifically focusing on females, but this also shows the lose of individuality or the disbursement of the self within the society. Cyborg writing like this shows how the individual can lose some of the boundaries between their self and the outside, cultural self.
ReplyDeleteToby Staffanson - Section 319
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAuthor Donna Haraway defines a cyborg as a “cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction” (475). Expanding on this definition, she claims that social reality comes from social situations and world-changing fiction. Using the example of the Women’s Liberation Movement, she says that they have created “women’s experience,” which, when combined with fiction, create the cyborg, a collection of experiences. The Western tradition allows for a sort of “experience dualism,” that being social reality grows out of nature, resulting in natural experiences. The cyborg, however, contains manufactured experiences, those that are premeditated, injected, and were not developed out of the cyborg’s own reality. As a result, the cyborg allows for several boundary breakdowns in nature. First, there is no longer a distinction between a carbon based human/animal and a silicon based machine/computer. Second, the distinction between human and animal has also been compromised and is no longer necessary. Third, the boundary between the physical and non-physical has become imprecise for the human. Haraway presents the notion of “cyborg writing,” that being using the silicon based system of the cyborg as a writing template. One example, as briefly mentioned earlier, is feminism. Feminism provides the “cyborg template” which builds up the social reality which becomes an experience, the Women’s Liberation Movement.
ReplyDeleteDave Myszewski - 319
Jon Elliott
ReplyDeleteFilm 319
I have read this article in a current lass (English 253 Cyberpunk) and Haraway’s definition of the cyborg is an interesting one. A cyborg is “a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction.” (180) We typically think of cyborg, and we think of the Hollywood Stereotypes of Robocop and Terminator, But Harraway expands on this stereotype and relates it to the women’s movement, and experience, by saying that in these hard social relations, women through the feminist movement are essentially cyborgs. In terms of the cyborg’s relation to western tradition, it is the image of imagination and materiel reality “the two joined centre’s structuring any possibility of historical transformation.” (181) The cyborg is this perfect example of an organic being is fused with materiel goods, much like the American desire to shop and purchase consumer goods. This is something that has existed in our culture for a long time, and will continue to do so.
The first boundary talked about is the one between humans and animals. This is where the cyborg appears, and people no longer have the need to separate human from animal the second boundary is between the organic and the machine. “This dualism structured the dialogue between materialism and idealism that was settled by a dialectical progeny, called spirit” (182) In these times of economic hardships, what would be more political and patriotic then going out and buying those material items? The third boundary that is breached is between the physical and non-physical, this lets us see past what the cyborg represents as a physical entity as well as a symbolic one. An example of the non-unified self is the context of Marxism. Marxism deals with making things equal, in the context of cyborg writing, the cyborg is the one who stands out and is this world of equality and brings something different to the table.
Ron Film 301
ReplyDeleteThe traditional definition of a cyborg is that it is a ‘cybernetic organism’ that could be looked at as a figure of reality or fiction. With this, Haraway goes a little more in depth when talking about the cyborg when saying in many ways human beings themselves are cyborgs and refers to the human as being both ‘material and opaque’ whereas cyborgs are perfect. The challenges the cyborg’s relation pose to Western traditions is the fact that it has no origin story. Haraway goes on to say that the cyborg skips the step of origin unity which identifies with nature in the western sense.
There is the breach between the human and the animal nothing really settles the separation between the two. The second boundary breakdown is between the human-animal (organism) and the machine. Finally, the third boundary breakdown is physical and nonphysical. In the cyborg writing, one example is when Haraway discusses that identities can seem contradictory, partial, or strategic. This is interesting because she points out that people’s identities are created for them. Throughout history a person’s race, class, and gender have been judged by others in a ways that restricts one from seeing their identity in a positive light. This is mankind’s obsession throughout history with one race, class or gender being best or superior over another.
Tom Burns section 319-002
ReplyDeleteThe definition being talked about here seems like it is dealing with the perception or mental attributes relating to cyborgs, as opposed to a cyborg being labeled so strictly based on physical anatomy, regardless if it can "think" like a human, or "process" like a computer. When Haraway speaks about perceptions and boundary breakdowns, it seems like we're talking about evolution. the classification and hybridization of silicon and carbon based beings brings in ethical issues which question the very state of our existence. is there an essence lost that descends humans to a strictly organic carbon based category, alongside animals? does the cyborg simply have the best of both worlds or is there, again, an essence lacking? when Haraway talks about "a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction” it seems related to the notion of superman. we can say he is not 'real', but we all have a image and perception of him that is just as real as your neighbor, what makes him not real then? it also seems like there is a nurture/nature aspect in regards to the dualism idea. what is a cyborg? and what can a cyborg be? is it born out of nothing with no history, a blank slate? then its 'persona' is acquired through time, much like an evolving being. or does it simply exist? that gray matter of existence in the middle is only bound to grow in our times.
In Donna Haraway’s essay entitled “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century,” Haraway illustrates the idea of how people in society in the modern era have become almost cyborg like. I have noticed while just walking around on an average day that most people have something electronic attached to their bodies. Bluetooth headsets for cell phones are the best of my examples. People will be walking around with little pieces of plastic attached to their ears so that they can be constantly attached to other people. I quote Haraway, “By the late twentieth century, out time, a mythic time, we are all chimeras, theorized and fabricated hybrids of machine and organism; in short, we are cyborgs.” I am thinking that in the future, our society will be starting to classify ourselves by the technology we possess. This action is has already started.
ReplyDeleteTheresa Ennis
Film 319
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHaraway describes cyborgs as creatures that are simultaneously animal and machine. She includes people who rely on machines to stay alive, as well as command control communication intelligence used in modern warfare. She say “the cyborg is a condensed image of both imagination and material reality, the two loined centers structuring any possibility of historical transformation. In western tradition the relationship between organism and machine has been a border war, were the boundaries of production, reproduction and imagination have been blurred. The idea of a cyborg can be seen as threat to western traditions because it is indicative of a post gender society; it threatens the gender boundary. It is a threat to the “myth of original unity” because it does not depend on the idea of the separation at birth from the phallic mother.
ReplyDeleteThe first boundary breakdown that gives the cyborg myth its political potential is the boundary between human and animal. Animal right movements and evolutionary theory have blurred the strong separation between man and animal that were once there. The second breakdown is between animal-human and machine. This boundary began leaking with the idea that pre-cybornetic machines could be haunted. Now 21st century machines have made the natural and artificial ambiguous. The final boundary that has been broken according to Haroway is the physical and non physical. Examples are micro electronic machines that are everywhere, but not visible, or silicon chips that are only atomic noise.
Feminism is an example of cyborg writing that expresses the dispersed, non-unified self because it explores bodily boundaries and social order, and weaves eroticism, cosmetology, and politics from imagery of embodiment.
joe steigerwaqld 319
A traditional Cyborg is a melding between an organism and a machine, usually seen in the science fiction community as man and machine. She expands upon this by telling us we are all cyborgs. More specifically the people of this place in time. Our reliance on computers and machines has made our societies essentially into cyborgs. Like the "skin-jobs" in Blade Runner cyborgs lack a natural origin, they have no mother. "Cyborg worlds are embodied in non-oedipal narratives with a different logic of repression," in other words the cyborg threatens to destabilize the foundation of the nuclear family and other social structures rooted in the psychology of the family unit.
ReplyDeleteThere a three boundary breakdowns animal/human, Organism/Machine, and Physical/non-physical. The first having to do with a realization of our relation to animals. The second involves a machines connection to humanity. Haraway notes how "machines are disturbingly lively" while we as humans have become "frighteningly inert". The third boundary, related to the second, is thought more in terms of soul, spirituality, or even self realization.
mike adams 319
Clarissa Ramos
ReplyDeleteFilm 301
In Donna Haraway’s "A Cyborg Manifesto" she defines a cyborg as someone/something that is partially machine and partially a living thing. Haraway states that the cyborg does not have an origin in a Western sense, however, she explains that "an origin story in the "Western", humanist sense depends on the myth of original unity, fullness, bliss and terror, represented by the phallic mother from whom all humans must separate, the task of individual development and of history, the twin potent myths inscribed most powerfully for us in psychoanalysis and Marxism" (476).
In terms of gender, a cyborg has been constructed in a world that is “post-gender”. From the Western perspective, the cyborg does not identify with nature. Culture and nature are reformed and are no longer considered responsible for constructing whole parts. The cyborg does not identify with humans in which a family is a sense of protection and community.
There are three “boundary breakdowns” that have given the cyborg myth its political potential. The first is the boundary between animal and human. People acknowledge the connection between animal and human and do not necessarily believe that there is a separation between animals and humans due to the evident association between nature and culture. The second boundary is between an organism and a machine. In the past, there was a confidence that technology was inferior to humans because machines relied on humans in order to function. However, in contemporary times, there is a fear that technology has progressed tremendously and the machines may have become more powerful than humans. The third boundary is between physical and nonphysical. Haraway states that “modern machines are quintessentially microelectronic devices; they are everywhere and they are invisible. Modern machinery is an irreverent upstart god, mocking the Father’s ubiquity and spirituality.
Writing is an accomplished form of technology for cyborgs. Cyborg writing serves as a substitute of a controlling story with a recognition of the stories that must be expressed in technology. Haraway presents questions regarding academic involvement of women, especially lesbians and cyborg feminists.
Julianne Arnstein 319
ReplyDeleteHaraway says that a cyborg is a combination of machine and organism. A cyborg does not adhere to nature but can still look real. The cyborg does not have an origin story which is similar to the Western tradition. Cyborgs break duality because they are neither man nor woman, animal nor human. They are something else, making them outside themes of duality. A cyborg is a machine and confuses duality by being in the middle or outside. A cyborg may look a certain way and have certain parts, but essentially it is not male or female. It is not an animal or a human because it is not really alive. A cyborg can only be put in the machine category, but because it looks and acts like a human (as in Terminator) it confuses people. If the Terminator has the body of a man, does that make him one? Well, no because he does not act human; his skin is only his skin: underneath his skin is the machine. I do not really understand the section on "cyborg writing" but all I can say is the cyborg was used to describe political issues, just as many other sci-fi films are used. The Terminator is about the male body being an object instead of the woman's. However, the film shows that men are strong and women are weak. In Blade Runner we see much the same thing, the two men are powerful and the women are on the side. But each film can also display how we should not move too fast in science because it can take us over.
Donna Haraway, in her article A Cyborg Manifesto, expands on the traditional tradition of a cyborg by explaining a notion of social reality, which is “lived social relations, our most important political construction of the consciousness, the imaginative apprehension, of oppression, and so of possibility.” (Harraway, 180) She explains the cyborg is a sort of mixture of ones reality and that of fiction and relates this to women’s struggle of the late twentieth century. The cyborg breaks down and challenges the Western tradition by breaking down the boundaries of machine and nature. Man is used to be “all controlling” and to have dominance over nature. The relationship between nature and machine creates a friction of sorts that disrupts the traditional way of thinking. Traditional thinking also puts the white male in control of much of America’s government and way of thinking at the time and issues and anxieties surrounding this way of thinking can be brought to attention through the cyborg. The cyborg also brings into question notions of sexual difference as well, and could be used in political ways of thinking. Womens rights issues in the late twentieth century were subjects that could easily be told through the representation of the cyborg. Other boundary breakdowns that could be analyzed in the representation of the cyborg is the physical/nonphysical. The notion of how the organic and how the machine can coexist will always be brought into question through the cyborg.
ReplyDelete-Alex Sokovich 319
A cyborg, or as Haraway describes the complex term as a “cybernetic organism”, which is a cross between a human and a machine in a reality as well as fiction. This expansion of the term done by Haraway is how the creature is apart of reality yet still hold a level of unreality. These conflicts with the Western tradition due to the religious overtones of a singe unity, or single entity, and with the cyborg a duality, it conflicts. This brings about the “boundary breakdowns”, which defines as the way in which both human and animal barriers have been broken. Another is the way in which physical and non-physical become spread apart due to the machine and human origin being a creation. This division between human and non-human comes in the essence of society in “Cyber writing”. This term becomes the antithesis of what an industrialized society by keeping a tally of offenses continuing to consequences of society’s institutions (political, social norms). This writing from a silicon chip brings up question of how unified self creates massive differences that challenge whether or not humanity can be divided. By creating these anxieties we examine ourselves by reminding us how society has structure.
ReplyDeleteIn her manifesto, Haraway describes the cyborg as a sort of, social construction of the perfect future human. “The cyborg is a matter of fiction and lived experiences that changes woman’s experiences in the 20th century.” But I disagree. Other than describing the cyborg’s experience as one that cannot be narrowed down to one that is primarily ‘male’ or ‘female’ and unable to be classified as one race or sexuality, I believe the cyborg’s experience to be neutral. Haraway’s argument that the ‘origin story’ of Western culture is represented by the phallic mother from whom all humans must separate, therefore describing women’s experience as a mother to be one that is apart from man’s and therefore neutral is incorrect. I believe this to be a symptom of her Marxist ideology. The dualism that is inherent in the human condition cannot be found in the cyborg unless placed there by its creator, man, which does give it a biased perspective of culture being that it is historically patriarchal in nature, but does not define it as ‘male’.
ReplyDeleteHowever, as described by her ‘boundary breakdowns,’ the blurring of the lines that define these dichotomies is apparent in the creation of the cyborg. As technology blends what is animal and what is human in the name of scientific research, even medicine, these distinctions begin to unravel and run into one another. Here I think is the true definition of a cyborg: the chimerical bending of all life forms with their technological counterparts. For instance, if depth and integrity came hand in hand with surface/boundary, the acquisition of land would be a peaceful, diplomatic endeavor striving to benefit all parties concerned. Here is the true meaning of cyborg: and system of equality striving towards utopia that benefits all parties concerned. Sounds an awful lot like communism.
Film 319
Dona Haraway defines a cyborg in her chapter “A Cyborg Manifesto” as a cybernetic organism. She goes one to state that a cyborg also “is a hybrid of machine and organism, and a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction” (475). Cyborgs relation to the Western tradition is that is has no origin story unlike in the Western tradition where we are able to see traditions like racism, male-dominate capitalism, and progress which are all traditions audiences are able to view in Western traditional movies. The idea that cyborgs bring nontraditional thoughts and ideas into science fiction movies through the use of the imagination rather than tradition views allow cyborgs to not follow the Western tradition.
ReplyDeleteThe three boundary breakdowns that give cyborgs their political potential would be the boundaries between the human and animal; the animal-human and machine; and the physical and non-physical. The boundary between the human and animal over the last couple of centuries has become almost less necessary. With advances in Biology and evolutionary theory Americans have realized as Haraway states “produced modern organisms as objects of knowledge and reduced the line between humans and animals” (477). The boundary between animal-human and machine over the years has grown more together in the way that machines are acquiring more human like characteristics. A good example of this would be the Terminator who is a machine taking on human looks and characteristics. Lastly the boundary between the physical and non-physical is considered very imprecise for us as Americans. Cyborgs, cybernetic organisms, have not only broken off from the Western traditional ideas, but changed the way people view the boundary breakdowns of cyborgs.
Alex Moehn
Film 301
In the article “Cybord Manifesto” Donna Haraway defines a cyborg as a “cybernetic organism, hybrid of machine, and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction” (475). In western traditional movies, you often see traditions such as male dominance, racism, and the reproduction of men and women. In this sense the cyborg has no origin story in the Western sense. Cyborgs bring new ideas to science fiction films such as being able to reproduce asexually, rather from the traditional reproduction with man and a woman.
ReplyDeleteThere are different “boundary breakdowns” that give have given the cyborg myth its political potential. The advancement of animal rights is a clear sighted recognition of connection between humans and animals, which is the first breakdown Haraway mentions in the article. “Biology and evolutionary theory over the last two centuries have simultaneously produced modern organisms as objects of knowledge and reduced the line between humans and animals” (477). The second distinction is between animal-human and machine. The advancement when it comes to the technology of machine has allowed them to take the place of human work. They are more efficient and work faster compared to humans. The third distinction she talks about is physical v.s. non-physical.
Film 301
Quentin Hughes
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHaraway’s basically defines the cyborg as a being of "social reality, as well as a creature of fiction.” By stating this, Haraway blends different genres and aspects in order to form a combination of imagination/fiction and reality/non-fiction in the same way that a cyborg is a whole creature made of two parts. This contributes to how a cyborg poses a challenge to Western traditions. The cyborg, being a combination of reality and imagination, can only alter the reality aspect with the fictional portion, spawning a hybrid association that is new to any whole of the cyborg's portions. Nothing of the cyborg is original. If the cyborg WERE original/non-fictional/in-existence, then this being would not really be a cyborg, then.
ReplyDeleteThe three boundary breakdowns consist of the animal-human boundary (which deals with the variation of minds and psychology between beings of natural instinct and emotional), organism-mechanical boundary (which consists of life and the processes of living), and finally the physical-non-physical boundary (which deals with creation, atom-sized technology, and reproduction).
In an example of cyborg writing, the cyborg can be related to the idea of Marxism which corresponds to equality and unity. "Marxian socialism is rooted in an analysis of wage labour which reveals class structure . . . Labour is the humanizing activity that makes man . . .(pg 481)." Therefore, the cyborg is an original distinction and separates itself from any monotonous unity.
Matthew Balz
319
Haraway argues that the way humans are plugged into our own technology turns us into cyborgs - her definition as "born out of couplings between organisms and machines." Modern medicine, our forms of commercial production, and even our methods of war show a blending of humans and machines.
ReplyDelete"Original unity" is the process of conception, birth, and finally a separation from the mother which results in becoming an individual. Cyborgs skip this process, because they are not born in the same way as humans. In esscence, a human is expected to have a certain understanding or compassion for other humans because all humans are linked together by the bond of "original unity" with nature. A cyborg, who skips the process of "original unity" and begins its life as an individual, cannot relate to nature. This is frightening if we agree with Haraway's argument that we are cyborgs. Without bonds of nature, humans can lose all sense of humanity.
Further, the cyborg idea challenges western notions of dualism. One example Haraway posits is one possible outcome of a cyborg revolution: "the final appropriation of women's bodies in a masculinist orgy of war." Cyborgs blur the differences between male/female and erase traditional western gender roles.
The three "boundary breakdowns" are: first, the presentation of the theory of evolution as fact; second, the technology that makes machines seem unnervingly life-like; and third, the creation of portable machines that humans strap to themselves.
"Cyborg writing" is "the power to survive...on the basis of seizing the tools to mark the world that marked them as other." Many African slaves brought to America risked their lives to teach reading and writing because those skills "are crucial to the Western ... distinction between...primitive and civilized mentalities." The only way move forward in society is by reading and writing, so slaves were kept suppressed by their illiteracy. The ability to transcend one’s station in life through writing is a distinctly cyborgian idea, because the transcendence is through a technological means (reading and writing) rather than a natural means.
Sandra Figueira
Film 301
In her essay, Donna Haraway expands on the traditional definition of the cyborg by going beyond the physicality of machine and the biological. She explains how the “cyborg is a condensed image of both imagination and material reality; the two joined centres structuring any possibility of historical transformation.” The cyborg challenges the Western tradition by having “no origin story in the Western sense;” one which could not be represented by the pre-oedipal, phallic mother.
ReplyDeleteHaraway documents three crucial boundary breakdowns that make political analyses of the cyborg possible. First is the boundary between human and animal. She speaks the positive connections between humans and other living creatures, joining the “discredited breach of nature and culture.” One could argue that the personification or humanizing of animals or pets could fit within that human/animal boundary breakdown. Another breakdown is the one between organism and machine. Living and evolving worlds, in a sense, can be digitally created within a machine. Artificial Intelligence is a mainstay of modern computing, making some of the differences between natural and artificial “thoroughly ambiguous.” Lastly, she speaks of the breakdown between the physical and non-physical – of how “modern machinery is an irreverent upstart god,” invisible and omnipresent.
Haraway speaks of how there has not been another time in history when the confrontations between race, gender, sexuality and class needed more political unity than now. In this way, cyborg writing can be a medium to express notions of a non-unified self.
Donna Haraway describes the cyborg as a being manifested in the “border war” between imagination and material reality. She says that since the cyborg has no story of origin it is separated from gender formations and the idea of a need for heterosexual reproduction. They have neither dreams nor desires, no sense of community or family. She goes on to describe the three boundary breakdowns, the first being the identification of humans as different from animals. The second is the distinction between humans/animals and machines. The third is the physical from the non-physical. The cyborg transcends the boundaries of distinction and dualism in humans, so it is not concerned with political affiliation as it is not concerned with human goals. “Cyborg Writing” speaks to a self not defined by a negative identity. The cyborg self responds to the world through affinity rather than a constructed identity.
ReplyDeleteThe stereotypical definition of the "cyborg" is more literally an amalgamatin of machine and man. Haraway expands upon this by more broadly including all people as "cyborgs." This is not that great of a stretch as consider each person's dependancy on computers, cell-phones, I-pods, etc. We are all linked with machines every day. The Cyborg challenges western culture in the ideas that it does not have an "origin story." It has no traditions or "history" to define itself. The first boundry breakdown lies between human and animal. However not many people see a true seperation between the 2 anymore and aknowledge we have a symbiotic relationship. The 2nd is the seperation between man/animal and machines. Today, modern machines (and even the idea of A.I in it's infancy) are showing the seperation is not what it once was. Humans co-habitate with machines as well. Thirdly, machines have gained the capacity to "write" as each imprints it experiences on it's microchips and are able to reproduce this information, essentially machines can create their own history. Cyborgs are now "affecting" western culture while building/creating their own. Cyborg writing is shown as a unifying experience for both machines and human beings. We recognize this emerging culture and, hopefully, this will encourage our own culture to come together and not continue to be divided. Politically speaking, Haraway shows the similarites between cyborgs and feminism.
ReplyDeleteDave Nawrocki 301
In “A Cyborg Manifesto” Haraway describes a cyborg as being as a cybernetic organism, saying it is kind of a hybrid between organism and machine. The cyborg relates to western tradition in that it has no origin story. The three boundary breakdowns are: the breach between human and animal, the animal-human and machine, and the physical and non-physical. Haraway points out that identities can seem contradictory in the way that their identities are created for them though past ideals. Ultimately people are sheltered from seeing themselves for who they really are because of the classifications that have been put on them by the larger society.
ReplyDelete